• Lun. Lug 15th, 2024

Atlantis is real: Official discovery of Atlantis, language and migrations

Atlantis is the Sardo Corso Graben Horst underwater continental block submerged by the Meltwater Pulses and destroyed by a subduction zone, Capital is Sulcis

Version 159 Atlantis is the semi-submerged Sardinian-Corsican geological block.

Atene 9600 a.C. circa, sommersa insieme al blocco sardo corso atlantideoAtene 9600 a.C. circa, sommersa insieme al blocco sardo corso atlantideo
Spread the love

The very interesting contribution of Geopop showing the Sardinian Corso Atlantis island when it was land during the Mesolithic:

Surprising discoveries in Sardinia: Paleolithic artifacts dating back 500,000 years

Recent archaeological discoveries in Sardinia have brought to light Paleolithic artifacts dating back 500,000 years. The oldest artifacts found in Sardinia date back to the Lower Paleolithic and were found in Anglona, ​​in the northern part of the island. These are flint and quartzite objects dating from between 450,000 and 120,000 years ago.

These artifacts represent some of the first evidence of human presence in Sardinia and provide us with valuable information on the life of the inhabitants of the island during the Lower Paleolithic. Flint and quartzite are two types of stone that were used to make tools and weapons during the Paleolithic.

The Archaeological and Paleobotanical Museum of Perfugas exhibits finds from all over the Anglona area, including artefacts from the Lower Paleolithic (500,000-120,000 years ago). This museum offers visitors the opportunity to admire these ancient artifacts up close and to learn more about the history of prehistoric Sardinia.

If you want to know more about the Paleolithic artifacts found in Sardinia, I recommend you visit the Archaeological and Paleobotanical Museum of Perfugas or do more research on the subject. These archaeological discoveries represent a unique opportunity to deepen our knowledge of the history of Sardinia and the life of its ancient inhabitants.

A new paradigm shift is taking place, as explained by Thomas Kuhn in the text entitled “The structure of scientific revolutions”: the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm.

Attempted scientific demonstration of the existence of the Isle of Atlantis, which coincides with the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, henceforth called the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block or Atlantis .

To evaluate a scientific theory, several criteria must be considered, such as consistency, falsifiability, predictability and verifiability. In this text, starting from version 138, I will try to respect these scientific criteria, studying them when necessary to better understand them. I’m still not able to make a scientific paper.

To evaluate the credibility of a source, various factors must be considered, such as the author’s authoritativeness, the quality of the information, the sources cited, the method used and the consensus of the scientific community. If a source doesn’t meet these criteria, it is likely to be unreliable or fake.

Sources for finding Atlantis

There is genetic, tectonic, archaeological, hydrographic, geological, geographical, paleontological, phonological, onomastic, toponymic and linguistic evidence for the existence of Atlantis, which will be listed below on this page. The text will be corrected infinitely, in an attempt to create a readable text for the scientific community.

In this paragraph I will coherently collect the sources I used for the research of Atlantis.

Here is a list of some scientific sources that support the claim that Sardinia and Corsica were one large island in the Pleistocene:

  1. Submarine Geomorphology of the Southwestern Sardinian Continental Shelf (Mediterranean Sea): Insights into the Last Glacial Maximum Sea-Level Changes and Related Environments
  2. Preservation of Modern and MIS 5.5 Erosional Landforms and
    Biological Structures as Sea Level Markers: A Matter of Luck?
  3. Relative sea level change in Olbia Gulf (Sardinia, Italy), a historically important Mediterranean harbour
  4. Sea-level change during the Holocene in Sardinia and in the
    northeastern Adriatic (central Mediterranean Sea) from
    archaeological and geomorphological data


On the population of the Corsican Sardinian block it is possible to consult:

Taken from wikipedia:

  1.  Mario Sanges,  The first inhabitants of Sardinia  ( PDF ), in Darwin Quaderni, January 2012, Darwin, 2012, pp. 32-39. URL accessed October 15, 2013 .
  2.  Jump to: a  b  Giulio Badini,  Sardinia, first men arrived 250,000 years ago , in Archivio storico Corriere della Sera, Archiviostorico.corriere.i, 2002.  URL viewed on 25 November 2013  (archived from the original url  on 3 December 2013 ) .
  3.  www.nurighe.it – IL TAG , su nurighe.it. URL accessed May 4, 2016 .
  4.  Julien Vandevenne,  The finger on homo sardaignus? , su Archives du Fifteenth day of the month, monthly of the University of Liège., www2.ulg.ac.be, 2002.  URL consulted on November 25, 2013  (archiviato from the original url  on September 18, 2020) .
  5.  Barbara Wilkens,  The phalanx of the Nurighe cave near Cheremule : revision and new information  link broken ] , in Sardinia, Corsica et Baleares antiqvae: An International Journal of Archaeology, www.academia.edu, 2011.  Retrieved 25 November 2013 .
  6. ^  Paolo Melis,  Prehistoric and protohistoric research in Sardinia: new developments , in  Architectures of prehistoric Sardinia: new hypotheses and research , Proceedings of the Nuoro conference of 15 October 2004, 2007, pp. 30-43
  7.  Sandra Guglielmi,  Amsicora , the oldest inhabitant of Sardinia , on ArcheoIdea, Archeomilise.it, 2011.  Retrieved 8 February 2015 .
  8.  Unione Sarda,  Amsicora: 9,000-year old man. Buried in Arbus, he is the   father of Sardinians  February 2015) .
  9.  Adn Kronos (  Archeologia, Amsicora found: Sardinia’s oldest human skeleton) , at www1.adnkronos.com, Adnkronos.com, 2011.  Retrieved 8 February 2015  (archived from the original url  on 4 March 2016) .
  10.  Sandra Guglielmi,  “Amsicora”, the oldest inhabitant of Sardinia , on archeomolise.it, 2011.  Retrieved 8 February 2015 .
  11. Sondaar, Paul; Elburg, Rengert; Hofmeijer, Gerard; Spaan, Andries; Visser, Hannie; Sanges, Mario; Martini, Fabio. (1993). The peopling of Sardinia in the late Pleistocene: new acquisition of a human fossil remains from the Corbeddu cave. Journal of Prehistoric Sciences, 45: 243-251.



1) Timaeus and Critias, two Platonic dialogues which are the original source of the story about Atlantis and its disappearance;

2) geological data, relating to the geological structure of the Sardo-Corsican block, and relating to the phenomenon of Meltwater Pulses, in particular Meltwater Pulse 1b; in particular the graben-horst structure present in present-day Sardinia and in Sulcis, and the Sinkholes present in Sulcis. In the Sulcis there is the phenomenon of sinkholes 3 . These are chasms that open up in the ground due to the subsidence of underground cavities. Some studies have hypothesized a possible correlation between sinkholes and human activities, such as mining or irrigation 2. Although at the moment I have not yet found any evidence that the sinkholes in the Sulcis have anything to do with Atlantis or with the shape of concentric furrows described by Plato, I am of the opinion that further studies on the matter could show not only a correlation, but probably also a stringent link of cause and effect: if indeed Sulcis was the capital of the island of Atlantis, then a flooding of the Sulcis could have caused the opening of sinkholes which caused the inhabited center to collapse and collapse, causing death and destruction in Atlantis , as told by Plato in Timaeus and Critias.

Among the geological, archaeological and archaeogenetic evidence, the University of Cagliari is mentioned on the page:

whose title is: Man in Sulcis already 9 thousand years before Christ, The confirmation comes from the new excavation campaign led at Su Carroppu by prof . Carlo Lugliè, professor of Prehistory and Protohistory
article dated 04 October 2017.

Among other sources on the subject:


3 October 2017
Culture (Page 39 – Edition CA)
«Man at Su Carroppu already in the Mesolithic period»
ARCHEOLOGY. The discovery of the scholar Carlo Lugli is now confirmed by DNA tests

March 1, 2017 Chronicle, Highlights 07, Uncategorized
THE NEW SARDINIA of Wednesday 1 March 2017
First page
Those first Sardinians not very nuragic
They arrived 11,000 years ago: but they weren’t the ones who populated the island
THE NEW SARDINIA of Wednesday 1 March 2017
Culture – page 35
In the cave of Su Carroppu
the secrets of prehistoric Sardinians
The genetic makeup of the very first inhabitants of Sardinia has been identified
Very different genes from the Nuragic ones, in turn similar to the current ones
The SARDINIAN UNION of Wednesday 1st March 2017
Culture (Page 47 – CA Edition)
The first Sardinians? Different from us
A DNA study reveals it
The Mesolithic islanders with different genetic characteristics from the Neolithic
Research: in Sulcis the migrants of 8 thousand years ago
Defined ancient DNA, gene discontinuity between Mesolithic-Neolithic
28 February 2017 Chronicle, Highlights 03
Other information:

On the fact that the Villanovan populations could be Sardinian-Corsican migrations, it is possible to compare the statements with the following scientific paper:

 2019; 9: 13581.
Published online 2019 Sep 19. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49901-8
PMCID: PMC6753063
PMID: 31537848

Genome-wide analysis of Corsican population reveals a close affinity with Northern and Central Italy


3) bathymetric data, in particular related to the submerged structures found in the Sicily Channel, in the seamounts of Alfil Bank, Birsa Bank, Bouri Bank, El Haouaria Bank, in the Sicily-Malta Hyblean carbonate platform flanked by the Sicily-Malta Escarpment.

4) Some translations available online of the texts of the Temple of Edfu in Egypt;

5) the videos available online, in particular on Youtube, relating to the theories of Professor Sergio Frau and the geologist Mario Tozzi; these videos have helped and inspired me a lot, greatly enriching my basic culture on issues related to the research of Atlantis;

6) the text by Professor Marco Ciardi, Atlantis A scientific controversy from Colombo to Darwin, Carocci editore, Rome, 1st edition, November 2002; in particular, after studying Ciardi’s text, I understood thatthe texts of Timaeus and Critias contradicted the biblical chronology. An amanuensis writer who had translated these two passages would have asked his superior: “The Bible says that the world originated around 4000 BC: how is it possible that the Sardo-Corsican island dates back to 9600 BC?”. Faced with a moral dilemma that contradicted the Catholic Church, more or less as happened with Giordano Bruno and Galileo Galilei, and the publication of Descartes’ “Mondo”, probably the only acceptable solution was to undermine the credibility of the text conclusive, so that the date of 9600 was not considered valid or reliable by the known texts. The Romans, for their part, to counter the old name of the Mediterranean Sea, which in the past was called the Atlantic Sea or Atlantic Ocean, called it “Mare Nostrum”:

7) among the sources provided by linguistics and glottology, some videos, in particular present on youtube, on the works of Professor Salvatore Dedola relating to the Sardinian language and toponymy; newspaper articles and web pages dealing with the links between Sardinian, Corsican, Sicilian, Basque, Albanian and Romanian languages ​​and dialects; the works explained in various youtube videos by Professor Bartolomeo Porcheddu; the ideas explained in some web pages on the linguistic affinities between the Sardinian languages ​​and that of the Basque population, when treated by Professor Juan Martin Elexpuru. Basically, some scholars have already noticed the linguistic and genetic commonality of other peoples with the Sardinian one, but they had not been able to understand and justify the cause. Some have even understood the reverse meaning,

8) a decisive role was played by my ability to imagine what had happened in the past. It was crucial to understand that if there are submerged structures in the Sicilian Channel, which could also contain the structures called Pillars of Hercules, as stated by Frau, then there are pieces of ancient history, protohistory and prehistory that have not yet been discovered nor clarified by the scientific community. This allowed me a certain strategic advantage over other scientists: the fact of having in hand scientific data not yet formalized by science, which I could use to interpret the past and to try to reconstruct it. For example, on the Sicily-Malta continental shelf there is a rectangular structure of approximately 8 km x 19.5 km. This structure, which I discovered and made public, does not yet have a name.




So not only the Corsican Sardinian Atlantis sank, but also the first Athens, which now, according to my interpretation, would be submerged in the submerged Hyblean carbonate platform Sicily Malta, bordered by the Sicily Malta escarpment, recently discovered by the scientific world and still in study and analysis phase.

9) another source I used is the analysis of toponymy. I’m no expert, I had to build my theory assumptions on assumptions. After realizing that Atlantis is the Sardinian-Corsican block, I wondered where the capital would be. And observing the satellite maps I realized that the Sulcis is made up of geological structures that recall portions of concentric circles, like the capital of Atlantis described by Plato. After re-reading the texts of Timaeus and Critias many times, I casually realized that in Sulcis, a region of present-day Sardinia, there were some toponyms that recall the Platonic story: many geographical localities of Sulcis in Sardinia (towns/towns/fractions /towns/cities) contain names related to the concept of cold water and hot water. However, these names of geographical locations are in Sardinian dialect, so a foreign scientist who does not know the Sardinian language and its constellation of dialectal forms could never arrive at my same conclusions. I had the advantage of being born right next to Sulcis, so these toponyms are in my first mother tongue, i.e. Campidanese Sardinian or its very similar variants (the linguistic variant of Sulcitan Sardinian). Much of the toponymy of Sulcis recalls the story of Atlantis: Acqua Callentis (hot water); Acquafredda (cold water); Acquacadda (hot water); S’Acqua Callenti de Susu (the hot water above); S’Acqua Callenti de Basciu (the warm water below); the Castello di Acquafredda (castle of cold water); Furriadroxiu (the place where everything turns upside down); Spistiddatroxiu (the place where you get hurt); Piscinas (the swimming pools)… and who knows how many others. I then became aware that Sardinian toponymy had strong points in common with the Egyptian one: but once again, I’m not an Egyptologist, so building up all this information is an incredibly difficult job. I have just discovered, in recent days (19/03/2023) that some scholars have already noticed this incredible coincidence between Egyptian and Sardinian culture and toponymy on the following web page:



10) the archaeogenetic research carried out by scholars of various universities, including the University of Cagliari, from which it can be deduced that present-day Sardinia was inhabited even eleven thousand years ago; in particular, a video containing the news entitled “Su Carroppu” , enlightened me a lot in this regard. The Sardinian news program “Su Carroppu” explained online that archaeogenetic traces had been found of a Sardinian population with a genome almost completely different from that of the Neolithic populations that colonized the island about three thousand years later .

La descrizione fatta durante la breve visione di questo telegiornale, ha illuminato dentro il mio animo la consapevolezza che questa popolazione di undicimila anni fa ha le caratteristiche perfettamente congruenti con la descrizione del popolo atlantideo: questo popolo predava soprattutto risorse marine; questo popolo di undicimila anni fa in Sardegna viveva soprattutto nella zona costiera; viveva in ripari sottoroccia o caverne; così lentamente presi coscienza che nel Sulcis esistono varie caverne, e questo era perfettamente coerente con tutta la mia teoria atlantidea. Le grotte di Acquacadda; le grotte Is Zuddas; le grotte di Nettuno, che si trovano ad Alghero nell’attuale Sardegna.




11) L’anomalia sismica causata dallo slab roll-back che avrebbe provocato l’affondamento del blocco geologico sardo-corso12.

12) Le anomalie batimetriche che rivelano possibili costruzioni subacquee nel Mediterraneo1.

13) La guerra tra Atlantide ed Atene finita nel 9600 a.C. descritta da Platone e confermata da alcuni ritrovamenti archeologici3.


Aggiornerò le fonti man mano che ricorderò da dove ho attinto per costruire la mia teoria su Atlantide sardo corsa.

Le isole Esperidi ed il Giardino delle Esperidi

Il Giardino delle Esperidi donava dei frutti d’oro, e si trovava agli estremi confini della terra conosciuta; è stata rilevata un’analogia col racconto apparentemente mitologico delle Esperidi nella toponomastica sarda: esiste infatti una località chiamata Fruttidoro, situata nella località di Capoterra, in Sardegna. Capoterra, dal sardo Caputerra, poi in latino “Caput Terrae”, è il “capo della Terra”, ossia l’estremo lembo conosciuto in antichità (mesolitico/inizio neolitico, intorno a 11.600 anni fa circa, per avere una data approssimativa ma utile alla comprensione), mentre l’attuale località di Fruttidoro a Capoterra sarebbe il leggendario Giardino delle Esperidi. Questa nuova scoperta non è ancora stata controvalidata dagli studiosi, né sono state svolte stratigrafie per la relativa controverifica. Il Giardino delle Esperidi si trovava nell’Oceano Atlantico, che come spiegato sul sito atlantisfound.it, era il nome mesolitico del mare che attorniava l’isola allora terra emersa sardo-corso-atlantidea. Le Isole Esperidi dovevano pertanto essere i nomi arcaici coi quali vennero definite Sardegna e Corsica nei millenni successivi alla semi sommersione del blocco geologico sardo-corso. Hesperidum Insulae, “Le Isole della Sera”, perché al tramonto, quando i Greci guardavano verso occidente, navigando in quella direzione dalla più remota loro postazione, ossia con grande probabilità l’isola d’Ischia, vedevano 2 isole lontane, che oggi sono note coi nomi di Sardegna e di Corsica, e che sono altopiani di terra emersa del semisommerso blocco geologico sardo-corso. Il linguista e glottologo Massimo Pittau ha analizzato la localizzazione del Giardino delle Esperidi, collocandolo presumibilmente in Sardegna e puntualizzando che si trattasse comunque di una leggenda; io invece nella mia balda ignoranza vado oltre e propongo che non si tratti di leggenda, ma di un luogo realmente esistito collocato a Fruttidoro di Capoterra, secondo quanto affermato in altri termini dal mito. Ovviamente, uno studioso serio dovrebbe studiare tutta la toponomastica di Capoterra e località vicine, per verificare i nomi più antichi ai quali sia possibile risalire e se in passato erano chiamati in altri modi. Ad ogni modo, una bella analisi basata sull’archeologia satellitare sarebbe opportuna, per evidenziare antichissimi insediamenti, mesolitici o neolitici, presenti sul luogo o SOTTO il luogo (perché con grandissima probabilità ormai saranno sommersi dagli strati sovrapposti nei millenni).


Quando Platone descrive il blocco sardocorsoatlantideo come una civiltà altamente sviluppata e tecnologicamente avanzata, questa frase va letta nel contesto in cui la Sardo Corso Atlantide esisteva, ossia prima della sua sommersione parziale nel 9600 Avanti Cristo, ossia circa undicimila e seicento anni fa. Moltissimi lettori di Platone invece, quando leggono la frase “altamente sviluppata e tecnologicamente avanzata”, credono che Platone si riferisca a noi che viviamo nel 2023 Dopo Cristo, per cui credono che quando si parla di popolazione avanzata tecnologicamente, questa debba disporre di raggi laser, teletrasporto, supercomputer dotati di super intelligenze artificiali… Questo errore viene commesso non solo da molti lettori, ma anche da registi e scrittori; ad esempio, il film cartone animato della Disney intitolato Atlantis – L’impero perduto, mostra che gli abitanti di Atlantide disporrebbero di tecnologie come moto volanti, con un sistema che appare come antigravitazionale. La teoria sardo corso atlantidea invece afferma che la popolazione atlantidea, che popolava in particolare le paleocoste del blocco sardocorso, oggi chiamate dalla scienza col nome di “piattaforma continentale sardo-corsa sommersa”, era avanzata tecnologicamente rispetto alle altre popolazioni del suo tempo, ossia quelle a lei contemporanee e che vivevano nel periodo antecedente ad 11600 (undicimila e seicento) anni fa.

Per fare un esempio chiaro: alla pagina Carro_(trasporto) di wikipedia, si legge che “Il primo carro accertato nei documenti mesopotamici risalì quindi al 3000 a.C., rinvenuto in un bassorilievo ad Ur denominato il carro dei felini, nel quale apparve il carro costituito da ruote piene a tre settori, con asse e ruota solidali ed un perno fissato ad un telaio, che nel caso dei carri funebri, raggiunse la dimensione di 50 cm per 65 cm”. Ma nelle descrizioni di Platone, Atlantide disponeva di carri da guerra ancora prima della sua sommersione nel 9600 Avanti Cristo. Secondo la mia teoria sardo corso atlantidea, è questo che significa “tecnologicamente avanzata”. Gli atlantidei erano esperti nella canalizzazione, nel realizzare canali di irrigazione. Questa era tecnologia avanzata, rispetto a molti altri popoli, secondo Platone, nel 9600 Avanti Cristo e prima ancora dell’affondamento.

I Mass Media, purtroppo, e moltissimi occultisti che hanno trattato il tema Atlantide, hanno contribuito purtroppo a inserire elementi caotici e confusionari nella ricerca dell’isola sommersa, per cui ancora oggi moltissime persone si attendono che ad Atlantide vi siano tecnologie futuristiche persino per noi oggi, ma questo è semplicemente un errore logico di ragionamento.


Non posso ignorare le altre interpretazioni di Platone e le evidenze storiche e geografiche che contraddicono la mia ipotesi: quindi in questa sezione mi occuperò appunto di questo, ossia di analizzare le singole teorie una ad una e cercare di mostrarne i punti deboli e forti di ciascuna rileggendoli sotto la luce della mia peculiare interpretazione. Per fare questo, userò i testi dei vari autori e cercherò di smontarli pezzo per pezzo. Non è questo che vorrei fare nella vita, ma purtroppo sono costretto in quanto voglio accelerare il processo di riconoscimento delle mie potenziali scoperte.



Nel Tempio di Edfu l’isola sardo corso atlantidea, attualmente semisommersa, è anche chiamata “L’Isola Primordiale”, “Isola dell’Uovo”, “Isola del Calpestio”, “Isola del combattimento”, “Isola della Pace”; essa si trova nel “Lago Eterno” (il Lago Eterno oggi è chiamato Mar Mediterraneo). I testi del Timeo e del Crizia affermano cose molto simili a quelle scritte in geroglifico nel Tempio di Edfu, usando parole e circumlocuzioni diverse. Combinando queste informazioni insieme, è possibile ricavare nuove informazioni sul blocco geologico sardocorsoatlantideo attualmente semisommerso.

Atlantis exists
E’ possibile vedere il blocco geologico sardo-corso da una visione inclinata, che permetta di capire come la piattaforma continentale fosse la paleocosta sardo-corso-atlantidea, distrutta da 11.000 anni di risacche marine, che hanno probabilmente distrutto moltissimi reperti archeologici mesolitici o precedenti. Non sappiamo ancora se siano presenti paleo porti.


Atlantis exists, found by Dr. Luigi Usai
Atlantis exists, found by Dr. Luigi Usai

Atlantide è il nome dato dagli Egizi al blocco geologico sardo-corso semisommerso quando questo era terra emersa, prima della sua sommersione/affondamento intorno al 9600 a.C.. Esso è effettivamente semisommerso, come narra il racconto storico platonico su Atlantide, ma due altopiani sono rimasti fuori dall’acqua, e la nostra civiltà ha dato loro il nome di “Sardegna” e “Corsica”. Vi era presente la “specie degli elefanti”, come dice Platone, infatti vi era il Mammuthus Lamarmorae.

La Sardo Corso Atlantide attualmente semisommersa era la più grande di tutte le isole; era collocata al centro dell’attuale Mediterraneo, che allora era chiamato mare di Atlantide, ossia Oceano Atlantico, chiamato in tempi successivi con tanti nomi, tra i quali  gli Egizi useranno “Il Grande Verde”, “Il Lago Eterno” per citarne alcuni. Era ricchissima di foreste, e questo è ancora vero e valido. Il clima era particolarmente mite, e anche questo è vero ancora oggi: infatti il mare ha funzioni affini a quelle che ha un condensatore in un circuito elettrico: smorza il clima caldo assorbendolo parzialmente, e mitiga i climi freddi rilasciando il calore accumulato in precedenza. Era ricca di minerali, e questo è vero ancora oggi, possiamo quindi immaginarci come doveva essere il blocco sardo-corso oltre 11.600 anni fa.
Era antica per gli antichi, e ne abbiamo una infinità di prove: la geologia ci insegna che le rocce sarde hanno oltre mezzo miliardo di anni di età. Vi abitavano i costruttori di torri, e questo lo sappiamo per certo, tanto che un’epoca è stata addirittura definita “nuragica”, e studiata in maniera abbastanza estesa, tale da fornire moltissima documentazione scientifica valida. Doveva essere situata al di là delle Colonne d’Ercole, e anche questo sembra essere corretto, dopo i ritrovamenti da me fatti in El Haouaria Bank e a Birsa Bank.

available via license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
La vastissima piattaforma continentale sardo-corso-atlantidea era la paleocosta di Atlantide. Available via license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International


The catastrophe mentioned by Plato must have been the geological phenomenon of partial submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block, caused by the Slab Roll-Back, by the possible presence of a tectonic fault which passes under the Sulcis and continues, on one side towards Gibraltar and from the other towards Pompeii and Herculaneum, and visible using the satellite and bathymetric map of Google Maps, available free online. Also, the Meltwater Pulses also happened at that time in history. The era in which the Sardinian-Corsican block was called Atlantis was therefore before 9600 BC. The mud caused by marine erosion and currents made it impossible to sail along the island by ship, so the island probably remained unreachable for a few centuries, thus helping to make people forget the power of this warlike ancient people. Atlantis has a north-south orientation, as stated by Plato. The northern part is full of excellent winds for navigation, and in fact between Corsica and Sardinia there is one of the best sailing schools in Europe. The euhemeristic vision was correct: Poseidon was a very ancient ruler of the Sardinian-Corsican island when it was still dry land, then deified.

Why are there no archaeological or historical traces of such an advanced and powerful civilization in the Corsican Sardinian block? Because the population particularly preyed on marine resources, such as the two individuals found at the Su Carroppu rock shelter in Sirri, and to do so they lived on the Atlantean paleocoasts, today called the Sardinian Corsican Continental Platform. Part of the civilization and population that were located on the paleocoasts were submerged and then swept away by about eleven thousand and six hundred years of sea currents, which transformed the paleocoasts into a continental platform that now surrounds the Sardinian geological block. Furthermore, we know from experience that sedimentary deposits stratify over the years: for example, the Roman remains of about two thousand years ago are potentially found under a few meters of sediment and debris. Therefore, strictly speaking, if a scholar wanted to find the sedimentary layers that contain the remains of the Atlantean civilization, he would have to make a stratigraphic study that reaches the stratigraphy of 9600 BC, i.e. the layer of about 11600 years ago.

The rock shelter Su Carroppu has returned the DNA of two individuals out of three, of a population with almost entirely different DNA from the DNA of the population that subsequently colonized the island of Sardinia three thousand years later. Therefore, we can temporarily hypothesize that the two individuals analyzed at Su Carroppu di Sirri are of Atlantean population. From this hypothesis, it can be deduced that the Atlanteans, in addition to plundering marine resources and living in the paleocoasts, lived in caves or in rock shelters. Various very ancient caves are concentrated in Sulcis: the caves of Is Zuddas; the cave of Acquacadda; and other caves that I am currently unable to list, but may slowly be added to this list. Therefore, in order to disprove my theory, it would be enough to carry out stratigraphic analyzes in these caves, to prove that they were not inhabited in 9600 BC or before. Indeed Plato states that the Atlantean catastrophe dates back nine thousand years before Solon’s journey to Sais in Egypt, and this journey took place approximately in 590 BC. From these statements, another very important question can also be answered, given below.

If the Atlantean civilization was as advanced and powerful as Plato says, it should have left traces on the mainland as well, not just on the paleocoasts. And in fact, in my opinion, he left the traces in the caves around the plateau of Atlantis which now emerges from the sea and which has been called, by our civilization, with the name of Sardinia. In fact, remains from about 20,000 years ago were found in the Lanaittu cave, and this is perfectly consistent with the Sardinian-Corsican Atlantis theory. Atlantis was also inhabited 20,000 years ago. Indeed, at present it seems that Sardinia was inhabited since at least 300,000 years ago. That’s why Plato says it was “ancient for the ancients”. And this would also be why the priest of the goddess Neith in Sais told Solon that the Greeks were never old, they were young men, and that their mythology was very much like children’s fairy tales. The priest was trying to explain to Solon that the Greeks had lost the memory of what happened between the Sardinian Corsican Atlantis and the first Athens, because the survivors were not literate and could not write and pass on the memory of what happened around 9600 BC .

Tutto quanto affermato è coerente, come deve essere una corretta teoria scientifica. Quindi le tracce degli Atlantidei, dotati di differente dna già classificato dagli studi archeogenetici compiuti dal Dipartimento di Preistoria dell’Università di Cagliari insieme all’Università di Firenze e Ferrara e pubblicati su Scientific Report, devono essere cercate nei ripari sottoroccia di tutta la Sardegna e Corsica e nelle grotte sparse in queste due isole, che in realtà sono altopiani emersi fuori dal mare dell’isola sottostante di Atlantide. Atlantide era uno dei nomi che gli Egizi davano a quest’isola, che nelle mura del tempio di Edfu in Egitto è chiamata anche Isola del Calpestio, Isola della Guerra, Isola della Pace, Isola dell’Uovo etc. Rileggendo e analizzando i testi del tempio di Edfu in questa chiave, è possibile ottenere nuove informazioni su Atlantide e le sue origini, che sembrano radicarsi nella mitologia Egizia.

Come si spiega il fatto che Platone descrive Atlantide come un’isola circolare con un canale navigabile al centro e una serie di anelli concentrici di terra e acqua, mentre il blocco sardo-corso ha una forma irregolare e non presenta queste caratteristiche? Perché la descrizione ad anelli riguarda non tutto il blocco sardo corso atlantideo, ma solo la capitale di Atlantide, l’attuale Sulcis. Come ho precedentemente spiegato, nel Sulcis è presente una struttura quasi circolare, delle dimensioni indicate da Platone, ma dopo undicimila e seicento anni di pioggie, allagamenti, motti tettonici causati dalla struttura a graben-horst del Sulcis, e motti tettonici causati dalla struttura a Sinkholes del Sulcis, hanno fatto si che queste porzioni di terreni, che presentano le strutture antichissime segnalate da Platone, come il Tempio di Poseidone, si sono spostate dalla loro posizione originale. Per cui occorre una seria e rigorosa indagine stratigrafica. Io non sono né archeologo, né stratigrafo, né geologo, non sono quindi in grado di occuparmi in prima persona di questa analisi. Credo però di aver fornito un potenziale importante contributo alla ricerca con tutte queste informazioni.

Ci sono prove di un contatto tra gli Egizi e gli abitanti dell’altopiano atlantideo chiamato Sardegna: esistono infatti almeno circa 300 reperti archeologici che gli studiosi definiscono “egittizzanti”. In questi giorni è stato stretto un accordo siglato dalla Direttrice Luana Toniolo e dal Direttore della fondazione museo delle antichità egizie di Torino, Christian Greco, per lo studio e l’analisi di questi reperti.


Platone descriva Atlantide come un’isola più grande della Libia e dell’Asia insieme: questo è possibilissimo, in quanto al momento attuale noi non sappiamo quale fosse la dimensione esatta della Libia e dell’Asia nel 9600 Avanti Cristo. Quindi potremmo procedere con un ragionamento inverso: supponendo che Platone abbia riportato fonti egizie autentiche e veritiere, possiamo dedurne quindi che nel 9600 a.C. la Libia e l’Asia erano due zone geografiche che coprivano un’area geografica inferiore a quella coperta dal blocco geologico sardo-corso attualmente sommerso sotto il Mediterraneo. Inoltre la Libia del 9600 a.C. potrebbe non corrispondere affatto con la libia attuale né con il concetto di “Africa”. Anzi, le scoperte fatte da Luigi Usai in Birsa Bank, El Haouaria Bank, nella Piattaforma continentale carbonatica iblea Sicilia-Malta, fiancheggiata dal Sicily-Malta Escarpment, mostrano vastissimi territori attualmente sconosciuti all’archeologia ed alla storia ufficiale, per cui la Comunità Scientifica deve ancora chiarire di che civiltà scomparse si tratti, se si tratti effettivamente di edifici e città sommerse; quali civiltà siano; perché sono sommerse; quando sono state sommerse, a causa di quali eventi. Insomma, le nuove scoperte sui fondali del Mediterraneo aprono scenari estremamente interessanti ed innovativi.

Come mai non ci siano prove archeologiche concrete della sua esistenza nel blocco sardo-corso? Perché gli archeologi sardi si sono fermati ad analizzare gli strati fino al nuragico; al momento attuale sembrerebbe che nessuno abbia scavato fino agli strati stratigrafici del 9600 avanti Cristo, rendendo quindi impossibile avere le prove archeologiche, che quindi non sono mai state cercate, in quanto il mondo accademico sardo, nella sua quasi totale interezza, credeva che Atlantide fosse frutto della fantasia di Platone, come affermano vari archeologi in moltissimi video e testi pubblicati online, ad esempio al Seminario chiamato “Sa Mesa Archeotunda”.


Athens circa 9600 BC, submerged together with the Corsican Atlantean Sardinian block
Athens circa 9600 BC, submerged together with the Corsican Atlantean Sardinian block, located on the Sicily-Malta Hyblean carbonate platform, discovered by Luigi Usai


On the submerged Iblea Sicily-Malta carbonate continental shelf , flanked by the Sicily-Malta Escarpment , Dr. Luigi Usai (the writer) found a perfectly rectangular structure on what appear to be the Mesolithic paleocoasts of currently submerged eastern Sicily. Upon closer analysis, it was possible to ascertain the presence of structures with perfectly geometric shapes, which appear to be man-made. More studies are needed for understanding; however, it is already possible to consult online images of this possible archaeological find.

Video of the potential discovery:


La Prima Atene del 9600 a.C.? Dovranno essere fatte delle verifiche.


Se quanto detto da Platone su Atlantide è davvero un evento storico, come affermato in Timeo e Crizia, allora si potrebbe ipotizzare che questa sia la prima Atene, sommersa nel 9600 a.C.. Se ciò si dovesse rivelare vero, tutto ciò che è stato detto da Platone ha un riscontro oggettivo nel mondo reale. Certo sarebbe molto strano che la Prima Atene avesse sede in Sicilia. Il punto importante da sottolineare è che sembrano esserci moltissimi riscontri oggettivi: la batimetria è una Scienza. Quindi anche le mappe batimetriche fanno parte degli strumenti utilizzabili dal metodo scientifico. Alcuni studiosi hanno sottolineato che talvolta appaiono degli “artefatti” sul fondale, causati da cattiva acquisizione dei dati. Dopo però circa 20 anni nel settore informatico, ho cognizione di causa sufficiente per stabilire che la possibilità che si tratti di artefatti errati è estremamente bassa, altrimenti avrei dovuto trovare dei rettangoli in altre parti del mondo, cosa che non è mai accaduta, nemmeno esplorando i fondali di tutto il mondo per due anni consecutivi circa. Il rettangolo sommerso è presente inoltre in un punto che risulta essere paleocosta mesolitica, per cui è ancora più probabile che si tratti di una struttura antropica realmente esistente. Inoltre, nell’ultimo anno la risoluzione è cambiata e migliorata. Se si trattasse di un artefatto, i nuovi rilevamenti avrebbero dovuto cancellare l’errore e sovrascriverlo coi dati corretti, ma ciò per ora non è avvenuto.



Nel blocco sardo-corso la toponomastica, utilissima agli archeologi, richiama chiaramente le fonti d’acqua calda e fredda poste secondo il racconto platonico nell’Isola di Atlantide da Poseidone: esistono delle frazioni di paesi chiamate “Acquacadda” (Acqua Calda, in lingua sarda campidanese), S’acqua callenti de basciu (L’Acqua calda di sotto, in sardo campidanese) e S’Acqua Callenti de Susu (L’Acqua calda di sopra, in dialetto sardo campidanese), mentre nel vicino paese di Siliqua è presente ancora oggi la fonte d’acqua fredda di Zinnigas; a Siliqua il “Castello d’Acquafredda” è tutto ciò che rimane della cittadella medievale di Acquafredda. Insomma, persino la toponomastica richiama il mito platonico. Inoltre, Solone ascoltò il racconto nella città egizia di Sais, e Sais è anche il nome di una frazione geografica vicino a Narcao: località di Is Sais inferiore e Is Sais superiore di Narcao (SU), nel Sulcis nell’attuale Sardegna; è inoltre un cognome sardo. La toponomastica si ripresenta in maniera apparentemente corretta, e proprio negli stessi punti geografici (il Sulcis, nell’attuale Sardegna) dove la toponomastica richiama le fonti poste da Poseidone. E curiosamente, sempre nel Sulcis, vi è una località chiamata Piscinas… altra toponomastica che ricorda il tema dell’acqua o degli allagamenti. Mentre in relazione alla toponomastica egizia, troviamo una località chiamata “Terresoli” (Terra del Sole, in dialetto sardo campidanese) che ci ricorda molto da vicino Heliopolis (Città del Sole). Siccome il Sulcis “s’esti furriau”, hanno chiamato una frazione “Furriadroxiu“; siccome molta gente è morta o si è ferita gravemente, l’hanno chiamato “Spistiddatroxiu“. In Sardegna abbiamo Olbia, e Olbia esiste anche nell’antico Egitto. A questo punto è ancora difficile da dimostare, ma il paese di Sinnai in Sardegna potrebbe scoprirsi imparentato col Sinai in Egitto: questa affermazione è tutta da dimostrare, ma ormai non sembra più trattarsi di coincidenze: occorrono studi approfonditi di settore. Carnac in Francia è celebre per i megaliti, e altrettanto Karnak in Egitto. Il nome della città è lo stesso, ma la fonetica è espressa con differenti valori consonantici, dove K e C hanno lo stesso significato semantico, ma grafia differente.

Abbiamo visto il cognome Sais, ma anche il cognome Usai è interessante: esiste a Bologna la Mummia Usai, che dimostra i contatti tra la popolazione sardo-corso-atlantidea e l’antico Egitto.  Infatti, Usai  è un cognome esclusivamente sardo-corso-atlantideo: in tutto il mondo, chi si chiama Usai è di origini sardo-corso-atlantidee. Quindi abbiamo la presenza di cognomi sardo-corsi nell’Antico Egitto, e questo dovrebbe fare riflettere. Inoltre, nella Necropoli di Montessu a Santadi, nel Sulcis, è stata ritrovata un’incisione di un’imbarcazione egizia. Questo, ulteriormente, conferma i rapporti tra Egitto ed il Sulcis del blocco geologico sardo-corso-atlantideoUras è un cognome sardo e una città sardaAssieme alla Mummia Usai, a Bologna, sono presenti sale con bronzetti, e a tutti i sardi sono noti i bronzetti nuragiciAbis è un cognome Sardo, Abis è un toponimo dell’antico Egitto. Olbia è una città sarda, Olbia è una città dell’Egitto. Uras è un cognome sardo, Uras è una località sarda, e contiene il tema di “Urano”, che potrebbe essere messo in relazione con Poseidone. Toponomastica ed Onomastica, quindi, confermano il mito platonico ed anche i rapporti con gli Egizi. I reperti egizi poi si trovano anche in altri luoghi della Sardegna, ma in questa sede, al momento resteremo focalizzati sul tema atlantideo.

Discovery of an unknown and hidden sunken city and civilization by the writer and philosopher Luigi Usai. We don't know yet what kind of people they are.
Entdeckung einer unbekannten und versteckten versunkenen Stadt und Zivilisation durch den Schriftsteller und Philosophen Luigi Usai. Wir wissen noch nicht, was für Leute das sind.

E’ difficile spiegare in poche parole, lo farò in altro contesto: i Sumeri, gli Accadici e i Babilonesi, con altissima probabilità, erano migrazioni sardo-corso-atlantidee in tempi che gli scienziati adesso dovranno ricalcolare in base alle nuove scoperte. Sarà difficile e meraviglioso, dover riprendere tutti i testi daccapo e cercare di raccapezzarsi. Posso però darvi alcuni insights: probabilmente esistono dei legami tra il cognome sardo CadelanuCandelanu e Kandalanu, un re neobabilonese; tra il paese di Sarroch in Sardegna e Dur-Šarrukin di Ninive; queste scoperte aprono le porte ad un nuovo tipo di approccio con la cultura sumerica e mesopotamica in genere.
Atlantide era più grande della Libia e dell’Asia messe assieme: ora, per procedimento inverso, possiamo dedurre la dimensione di queste due realtà geografiche nel 9600 a.C. circa. Il popolo che avanzava spavaldo e voleva conquistare tutti i popoli che abitavano al di là delle Colonne D’Ercole, dunque, erano i Sardo Corso Atlantidei che abitavano il blocco geologico sardocorso quando questo era ancora terra emersa, prima della sommersione nel 9600 a.C. circa. Tutto il Sulcis (il Sulcis è una zona geografica della bassa sardegna, a Ovest di Cagliari) è ricchissimo di toponomastica Atlantidea: AcquacaddaAcquafredda (città scomparsa nel medioevo), Castello di AcquafreddaS’Acqua Callenti de SusuS’Acqua Callenti de BaxiuAcqua Callentis (altra frazione che significa Acqua Calda), oltre tremila e duecento toponimi sardi solo cercando la porzione di parola “funt” (“funti” o “fonti” significa “fonte” in almeno una delle varianti di sardo). E’ possibile controverificare le mie affermazioni con Google Maps e col database sardo dei toponimi regionali, oltre che nei modi da Voi ritenuti opportuni.

Platone narra infatti che l’Isola di Atlantide era ricca di acque. E infatti il linguista sardo di fama mondiale Salvatore Dedola (un supergenio che dovrete assolutamente studiare a fondo, assieme a Bartolomeo Porcheddu, altro studioso straordinario) mostra che Sassari, Thatari (nome sardo di Sassari) e Serramanna, per fare solo un esempio, significano “Ricca di Acque”. La toponimia e l’onomastica confermano il mito platonico. Sarà necessario aprire degli studi settoriali per apportare nuove informazioni a quelle per ora raccolte e dimostrate, ed è necessario che vengano fatte da professionisti del settore.


In merito alla zona Gadirica, è possibile che fosse il nome non di Gadir (Cadice), bensì di una omonima zona geografica del blocco sardo-corso, ora sommerso. Perché avrebbe lo stesso nome di Gadir? Per lo stesso motivo per il quale Teulada in Sardegna ha l’equivalente Teulada in SpagnaPula ha una Pula in DalmaziaAritzo in Sardegna corrisponde ad Aritzu in SpagnaMonastir in Sardegna corrisponde a Monastir in TunisiaAlguier (Alghero) corrisponde ad Algeri in Algeria, la frazione Su Vaticanu di Santadi corrispone al Vaticano a RomaPompu in Sardegna corrisponde a PompeiBari corrisponde a Bari Sardo, and I could go on and on, but I risk boring you. For this reason, Gadir della Gadirica, in the Sardinian-Corsican geological block, would correspond with Gadir (ie Cadiz) .

Discovery of an unknown and hidden sunken city and civilization by the writer and philosopher Luigi Usai. We don't know yet what kind of people they are.
Whether the first sunken Athens with Atlantis around 9600 BC?



Taking the longer diagonal that cuts the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean block, we obtain that it measures approximately 555 kilometres; this measure appears, calculated in stages, in the measures provided by Critias to describe the island. If we exclude “the band of mountains that fall directly on the sea” (i.e. the mountains now present in Corsica and the right side of Sardinia such as the Gennargentu), measuring the rectangular perimeter of the remaining territory currently semi-submerged, it is greater than 10,000 stadiums exactly as stated by Plato. It is therefore possible that the scientific community will carry out independent measurements to verify the veracity of these statements.



Summarizing for clarity: the priests of the city of Sais in Egypt were trying, in their own way, to explain to Solon a geological event of submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block in the center of the Mediterranean, a sea which in 9600 BC was called the Atlantic Ocean or Sea Atlantic (it took its name from the island of Atlantis, the largest of all before it ended up semi-submerged). Atlantis was therefore also larger than Sicily, which now, after its sinking, turns out to be the largest island, and not Sardinia.

Therefore the period of the sinking would be approximately around 9600 BC, differently from the hypothesis of the Sardinian Nuragic Atlantis, which is clearly wrong also for the reasons listed elsewhere by Sardinian archaeologists .

Stratigraphic analyzes must descend into the ground to find the remains of about 11,600 years ago, in order to find the remains of the “capital” of Atlantis or its population, and it is also very clear why there are no bodies of the deceased Atlanteans in the Nuragic layers.



Frau (2002), whom I sincerely thank for his extraordinary contributions to the discipline, places the Pillars of Hercules  between Sicily and Tunisia . Indeed, there is a possibility that these have been found. In fact, the scientific community from all over the world is in the process of analyzing the very recent discovery of what appear to be structures of an anthropic nature located right in the Strait of Sicily, found through bathymetric analyzes of the Emodnet system of the European Union , in Birsa Bank and El Haouaria Bank , exactly between Sicily and Tunisia, and a short distance from Pantelleria. A second anomalous discovery from a bathymetric point of view was made, ofan apparently rectangular structure in the Sicily-Malta continental carbonate platform , flanked by the Sicily-Malta Continental Escarpment (Sicily-Malta Escarpment for geologists) .


Birsa Bank founded by Luigi Usai
Birsa Bank: apparently submerged archaeological structures found by Luigi Usai using Emodnet bathymetries.


Submarine structures bathymetrically surveyed at Birsa Bank by Luigi Usai.


The Pillars of Hercules, submerged in the Birsa Bank seamount in the Sicilian Channel
The Pillars of Hercules? Structures submerged in the seamount of Birsa Bank in the Strait of Sicily, found by Dr. Luigi Usai.

The scientific world has not yet expressed itself on the matter ; it is not even known whether studies are being carried out on this matter. 5 computerized and independent bathymetric systems were used, programmed and managed autonomously, which returned the same results, which suggests that these structures really exist on the seabed. The cost of a shipment, however, is prohibitive for a single individual, and it will be necessary to wait for the intervention of third parties.



Why then was all around the submerged Corsican Sardinian island full of mud that prevented navigation ? Because the sea currents, after the sinking of the Corsican Sardinian geological block, began to tear away layers of soil that emerged from the surface as Sardinia does now, creating over the millennia what geologists today call the Sardinian “continental platform”. run . As the sea currents “washed” away layers of soil, destroying all the inhabited centers and structures that had been built before 9600 BC on the Sardinian-Corsican coastal strips, the water was clouded by muddy materials, and this is clear and obvious to thought and reflection.



Ad Atlantide “vivevano i vecchi più vecchi”, e tutti sappiamo dei centenari sardo corsi, al punto che il codice genetico sardo non solo è stato ed è studiato in tutto il mondo, ma è stato persino rubato (vedasi il furto di 25000 provette con 17 indagati, in seguito al furto delle provette di DNA dei sardi avvenuto secondo la stampa presso il Parco Genos di Perdasdefogu nell’agosto 2016). Che il blocco sardo-corso sia antico per gli antichi è ovvio agli studiosi colti: basta citare il ritrovamento di un frammento di carapace di Arthropleura armata del Carbonifero di Iglesias (Museo PAS – E.A. Martel di Carbonia), ma chi fosse interessato può informarsi presso un paleontologo, uno su tutti lo straordinario Daniel Zoboli. It is therefore obvious that the learned Egyptians were able, from many details, to understand the antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican block , which they called Atlantis .



The Temple of Horus in Edfu, Egypt: reinterpretation of the texts based on the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm

In Egypt, in the city of Edfu , there is a temple entirely covered in hieroglyphs. There are various translations, difficult to make also because of the content: in fact, the majority of these texts tell of the origin of civilization, of the origin of the world .

The Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean paradigm helps in deciphering these texts, helping to clarify the meaning of most of them; to understand better, however, it is necessary to provide the reader with some basic information which will then allow him to understand almost the entire text.

In the Temple of Edfu, the Mediterranean Sea is called “The Eternal Lake”, “The Eternal Lake” or “The primordial waters” . In the Eternal Lake there was an island that lay in the primordial waters, i.e. the Sardo-Corsican block when this was a single land above sea level, over 11,600 years ago, during the Pleistocene. This same island is called by Plato, in the dialogues entitled Timaeus and Critias, with the name of Atlantis. The historical account is the same, but a few different terms are used to describe the same things. By combining the texts of Timaeus and Critias with the information carved in the Temple of Edfu, it is possible to obtain further information useful for understanding the prehistoric past of the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean island and its relations with the ancient Egyptian world.

Edfu texts can be viewed at this address:

Since I didn’t know these texts, I will slowly begin to try to make them translatable by relying on all the information that has been provided to us by the Platonic texts and by new scientific discoveries of various kinds: archaeological, genetic, geographical, linguistic, etc.
For hieroglyphic writing analysis, I will make use of the typewriter available online here:

I will try to rewrite the Edfu texts trying to make them clearer for a contemporary citizen, replacing all the ancient terms with modern ones. For example, instead of “Lago Eterno” I will write “Mediterranean Sea”, instead of “Isola dell’Uovo” I will write “sardinian-Corso-Atlantean semi-submerged island”, and so on.

The primordial world of the Gods is an island (in hieroglyph iw) partly covered by reeds, which lay in the darkness of the primordial waters of the Mediterranean, occupied by Mesolithic inhabitants whose DNA was analyzed in two out of three individuals of the rock shelter of Su Carroppu, in present-day Sardinia.

This population was considered divine, the reason is not yet clear. Perhaps because they were culturally far ahead of the rest of the world’s population. They probably already knew some metallurgy in the Mesolithic (I still have to prove it) and this was perceived by other peoples as a divine characteristic. In fact, Nekhbet and other divinities have the symbol of metallurgy in their paws, which in my opinion is also the symbol that the Egyptians used to indicate the Sulcis or the origin from the mining Sulcis. Among the creator gods, Ptah seems to have a very important role. Now, it’s still unclear at the moment if this has anything to do with Poseidon. At present it is still difficult to understand, I am forced to study Egyptology to try to understand the possible connections. Some information can be found in the Stone of Shabaka. The creation texts are of the Heliopolitano or Hermopolitano type, from the respective cities where the texts were found engraved on the walls. The first Egyptian pharaohs were probably inhabitants of the Sardinian-Corsican block, i.e. of what for the Egyptians was the Primordial Island or Egg Island. In fact, the priest who speaks to Solon in Timaeus and Critias points out that at the beginning the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans had arrogantly attempted to invade the entire Mediterranean. Gobekli Tepe could be a Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean colony before the submersion. The partial submersion of the island and the death of millions of inhabitants, and the destruction of many cities and works of art must have been a tremendous trauma for the Sardinian settlers in Turkey.

Il mito prosegue: prima è Atum, il dio che aleggia sulle acque; poi appare il colle a forma piramidale dal quale ebbe origine il sole, e Atum lo scalò. Atum era bisex; pianse, e le lacrime divennero uomini e donne. Figliò, e nacquero Geb, la terra, maschio e sdraiato, e Nut, donnae a lui avvinghiata. Atum li fece separare dall’aria, Shu.

Atum che aleggia sulle acque, viene poi ripreso dalla bibbia: “E lo spirito aleggiava sulle acque”, in Genesi, prima della creazione. Geb e Nut ebbero figli: Iside, Osiride, Seth e Nephtys.

Questo è il mito di Heliopolis.

La Creazione Egizia Hermopolitana invece prevede che il sole sia nato da un tumulo. E infatti, in giro per il mondo, vi è stata almeno una civiltà che ha realizzato una quantità spropositata di tumuli. Persino negli Stati Uniti. Ciò dovrebbe quantomeno fare riflettere. Ora, nel Sulcis esiste una struttura fatta a tal guisa, ma non so se sia soltanto una coincidenza.






Platone afferma che dall’Isola di Atlantide (che qui si dimostra essere il blocco sardo corso) era possibile andare nelle isole intorno ed in quello che è veramente continente. Ciò risulta perfettamente vero: dal blocco sardo-corso, quando esso era terra emersa, è possibile andare nelle isole intorno, ed esso si trova realmente al centro dell’Oceano Atlantico (il nome mesolitico del Mediterraneo).
Noi sardi a livello linguistico, fortunatamente, abbiamo conservato ancora questi modi di dire: “Deppu andai in Continenti” (devo andare in Continente), quando dobbiamo andare nello Stivale. Questa affermazione fa morire dal ridere chi sente noi sardi dirlo, ma fortunatamente ci aiuta a capire cosa intendesse Platone: a livello linguistico, quando il blocco sardo-corso era terra emersa noi sardi chiamavamo linguisticamente l’isola “continente”. Uscire dall’isola era “andare in continente, in un altro continente”. Dopo l’affondamento, questo uso linguistico è rimasto a livello di dialetti sardi, per cui noi diciamo che “andiamo in continente”, facendo meravigliare chi ci ascolta. Inoltre, i Sardi chiamano gli Italiani che abitano nello Stivale “I Continentali”, a conferma di quanto scritto da Platone e detto dal sommo sacerdote Egizio a Sais, in Egitto, a Solone. Gli Atlantologi (ossia gli studiosi di Atlantide) fino ad oggi hanno interpretato la parola “Continente” con la semantica in voga attualmente; hanno dimenticato che nel 9600 a.C. la parola “continente” poteva avere una semantica, pragmatica e semiotica differente da quella attuale. Quindi qualcuno afferma che l’America è un continente, e quindi l’America può essere Atlantide. A mio avviso queste interpretazioni mostrano il fianco a numerose critiche, ed appaiono molto banali ai miei occhi.


Atlantis exists, found by Dr. Luigi Usai
Atlantis exists, found by Dr. Luigi Usai

In short, all Platonic statements, if placed in the right context, are rational and explainable correctly. However, they require a certain mental humility, a certain “willingness to listen”. Since they are strong affirmations, which have consequences, they probably need a few months of reflection and meditation before they can be properly assimilated and digested. Incidentally, it’s been 2600 years (from the time of Solon) that no one understood what the island of Atlantis was, indeed, it was stated almost everywhere that Plato was exaggerating. With regards to the submersion/sinking of the Corsican Atlantean Sardinian island , this would be a geological problem, where I can only speculate. For example, there may be at least three concurrent causes: Meltwater Pulses, in particular the meltwater pulse 1b, also studied by NASA technicians. In addition, geological settlement movements due to what geological experts call ” slab roll-back “. Furthermore, it has even been hypothesized, but still being verified, that a tectonic fault passes under the Sulcis, the same one that passes under Pompeii and Herculaneum, arrives under the Sulcis and continues up to Gibraltar . In possible support of the thesis that Atlantis is the Sardinian-Corsican island partially submerged and its continental shelf currently submerged, we report here some scientific evidence.  On February 28, 2017, a study was published in the journal Scientific Reports of the Nature group which presents new archaeogenetic data. These data reinforce the archaeological evidence of the clear cultural discontinuity between the first inhabitants of the island, dating back to about 11,000 years ago, and the architects of its definitive population which occurred about 3,000 years later, with the arrival of the first farmers-breeders. . This important discovery is based on the analysis of DNA extracted from the skeletal remains of two individuals buried in the prehistoric shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri in Carbonia . At present, these remains represent the oldest evidence of human presence on the island. Now, from 9600 BC to today about 9600 + 2023 years have passed, i.e. 11623. The evidence cited above is precisely from 11000 years ago. A study was conducted on the clear cultural discontinuity between the first visitors to the island of Sardinia around 11,000 years ago and the architects of its stable and definitive population, which took place around 3,000 years later with the arrival of the first farmers-breeders. The study is based on the analysis of DNA extracted from the skeletal remains of two individuals buried in the prehistoric shelter of Su Carroppu di Sirri in Carbonia, which represent the oldest direct evidence of human presence on the island. The study is part of the research project funded by the Autonomous Region of Sardinia on the history of the first Neolithic population of the island. The genetic sequences obtained were compared with ancient and modern data and revealed a large difference in the genetic variability of the current population of the island compared to the first humans who frequented it, with most of the genetic variability appearing to have been determined by the migratory flow of populations who introduced the productive economy starting from the most ancient Neolithic. The Mesolithic sequences of the Su Carroppu samples belong to the groups named J2b1 and I3, which have very low or low frequencies in Europe. The relevance of the scientific discovery stimulated the intensification of research in the key site of Su Carroppu, already investigated between the years 1960-1970 and currently the subject of systematic excavations directed by the University of Cagliari. Happy searching to all of you. If anyone is interested, the theory of Atlantis as the Sardinian-Corsican island and all of its continental shelf currently submerged, can also explain other things in a very intuitive way. For example, the Greeks and Romans probably thought that the submersion of the Corsican Sardinian geological block had been a punishment from the gods for the arrogant inhabitants, who “overbearingly attempted, in one fell swoop, to invade the lands on this side of the Colonne D’ Hercules (perhaps located in the current Birsa Bank, an apparently anthropized seamount below the Strait of Sicily, data scientifically verified through Emodnet bathymetries). First I tried to clarify the toponymy. Now we can try to clarify the onomastics: the Gods punished the Sardinian-Corsicans, called by the Egyptians “Atlanteans”, according to what was stated in the Platonic texts around 9600 BC, “crushing the Sardinian-Corsican island underfoot, and it sank” (the quotation mark is my hypothesis). And this is easily explained why the Greeks called Sardinia Ichnusa (footprint) and the Romans called it Sandalia (sandal imprint). Even the name is now very clear: they were Greeks and Romans who mocked Sardinia, which was what remained of the great Sardinian-Corsican power, which the Egyptians called “Atlantis” in the story given to Solon, who told it to Dropides, who spoke of it to grandpa Critias, who told him to grandson Critias, who told Socrates in the Platonic dialogues of Timaeus and Critias. If any reader wants to know the original history of the Corsican Sardinian geological block, before it sank around 9600 BC, he is obliged to read Timaeus and Critias, two texts written by the Greek Plato. All the rest of the texts published to date have done nothing but add entropy, chaos, confusion to the history of the Sardinian-Corsican block, as characters like Cayce or Madame Blavatsky, professional charlatans, used the Atlantis argument to money, publishing books full of lies and entertaining the curious, especially after they saw that Ignatius Donnelly’s book, entitled ATLANTIS: THE ANTEDILUVIAN WORLD, had had an incredible worldwide media coverage. Furthermore, cinema and television have introduced a lot of nonsense on the subject of Atlantis, so when we talk about this topic many have in mind pieces of films or cartoons or fantasy books that have nothing to do with it. what Plato said. Hence: the Greek name Ichnusa, and Latin Sandalia, confirm my hypothesis that the ancients thought that the gods punished the Sardinian-Corsican island by crushing it underfoot. There was still no geological science as we understand it today. Furthermore:la faglia tettonica di Wadati-Benioff che passa sotto Pompei ed Ercolano, e che le distrusse, è probabilmente la stessa che continua fin sotto il Sulcis nell’attuale Sardegna e prosegue ancora fino a raggiungere l’attuale Stretto di Gibilterra. Since this fault is activated in geological times, the citizens who live in the Sulcis are not aware of the seismic activity. When this releases its elastic energy, frightening disasters occur, such as the opening of the Strait of Gibraltar, the destruction of cities and places such as Pompeii and Herculaneum, or the submersion of the Sardo-Corsa island. But the submersion is probably also due to another very important cause: the geological settlement of the Sardinian-Corsican island following the “slab roll-back” which, as revealed to us by the ancient Egyptian priest, took place around 9600 BC. The Slab Roll-Back, concomitantly with the tectonic awakening of the fault present under the Sulcis and currently unknown to the official geology which instead knows a fault further south along Africa, and perhaps also due to the succession of various Meltwater Pulses after the Wurm glaciation, they caused the partial submersion of the Sardo Corsa island. Now,fuori dall’acqua, restavano solamente le cime delle montagne, che ora noi crediamo siano isole separate, e che ormai la nostra civiltà conosce coi nomi di Sardegna e Corsica. Furthermore, all the toponymy and onomastics present in Sulcis leave one question: why do all these Sulcis places recall Plato’s story? We will then be able to pick up the Platonic text again to try to understand why. First of all, if the Pillars of Hercules were located at Birsa Bank, and the Sardinian-Corsican island and its currently submerged continental shelf is really Atlantis, this means that in 9600 BC it was customary to call the current Mediterranean Sea with the name of Sea Atlantic (i.e. sea of ​​the island of Atlantis) or Atlantic Ocean (Ocean of the currently submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, i.e. Atlantis). I haven’t read Frau (2002) yet, so I don’t know if he has already published some of my statements, in which case I apologize in advance. Mine are only reflections resulting from the reasoning made in the last two years. Please let me know of any shortcomings or apparent plagiarism, thanks in advance. If all of this is true, then Poseidon was perhaps a man, and obviously not a deity (why, have you ever met one in person?), and this man fell in love with a teenage girl whose parents had died, Clito. The Platonic account states that Poseidon surrounded the hill with water channels. Now, just the Sulcis (but look what a coincidence! Or maybe it’s not a coincidence?) is volcanic in nature, so right in the center of the Sulcis there is a hill or mountain, if you like, not too high, and this is visible using satellite systems such as Google Maps or Google Earth, which even allows you to tilt the view by pressing the shift key on the computer keyboard. But are these places really ancient as Plato says or are they very recent places? Easy to verify: right in the center of Sulcis, you can verify that there are prehistoric IS ZUDDAS caves, and nearby there is ACQUACADDA (Poseidon put two sources there, one of cold water and one of hot water, and the locality is called Acquacadda …but look what an incredible coincidence!Of course I have imagination!) and very ancient archaeological finds have been found in the locality of Acquacadda. Now an expert might argue that the finds, for example, are only 6,000 years old. Note: an expert should look for the stratigraphic layers of 9600 BC: only then would it be possible to obtain more detailed information. Instead, currently, in these places groups of children are brought to watch. In my opinion this is dangerous but I’m not a stratigraphy specialist so I have no say in the matter. Also in Sulcis, the Su Benatzu cave was found, which is an authentic archaeological treasure, which could contribute to research on the topic “what happened in the millennia after the sinking of the Sardinian-Corso-Atlantean island?” (I have to develop this topic). Furthermore, in support of the theory of the submerged Sardinian-Corsa Atlantis, there is another scientific discovery of marine archeology: the discovery of a load of 39 ingots of orichalcum by the extraordinary Sebastiano Tusa off the coast of Gela, in Sicily. Newspaper articles speculate that they came from Greece or Asia Minor, but now that we have all this information about the submerged Sardinian-Corsican island, we can assume that they came from this now submerged island, which is located a very short distance away, which makes the hypothesis very plausible. The antiquity of the semi-submerged Sardinian Corsican geological block is known to official science, and in particular also to geology, which is aware of the so-called “rotation of the Sardinian-Corsican block” which began about 40 million years ago, after the detachment of the from the present coast of Spain and France, and lasted about 15 million years (take the dates with a grain of salt, I wouldn’t be surprised if they turn out to be incorrect in the future). This is possible to know, as stated by the well-known geologist Mario Tozzi, because a great deal of research has been done in the paleomagnetic field, which showed how the only way to explain the geomagnetic orientation of the Sardinian-Corsican stone and geological structures is to bring it back to coincide with the current Hispanic-French coasts. Furthermore, the fact that the geological structure of Sardinia has various types of Graben Horst may have also contributed to the possible submersion, so that these geological adjustments may also have contributed to important and significant telluric displacements for the Sardinian-Corso-Atlanteans people who lived there. For example, the Campidano plain in Sardinia is a Graben Horst. The antiquity of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block is clear to geologists from all over the world as there are even “graptolites”, to which the Sapiens program by the extraordinary geologist Mario Tozzi has dedicated videos (see: “Goni’s Graptolites at Sapiens”). Now, if Atlantis is really the submerged Sardinian-Corsican block, then we have to verify again what Plato said. Atlantis dominated the Mediterranean also over Libya and Tyrrhenia, and over many islands scattered on the Ocean (let us remember that we have already shown that Oceanus, in the texts of 9600 BC cited by the Egyptians, is the Mediterranean Sea, and not the current Atlantic Ocean ). But if it is true that it dominated, then perhaps there were linguistic influences as well? Of course, and the evidence already exists: many scholars have noticed the incredible similarities between Sardinian dialects and languages ​​and the Corsican language, Sicilian “dialect” (or should we say the language?) (Minimum Dictionary. Sardinian Corso Siciliano. Correspondenze nel Gallurese, by Emilio Aresu and others),mainstream as no one imagined the enormous importance of this type of work, which shows to all intents and purposes that the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean languages ​​have spread throughout the Mediterranean. And now, thinking about it, we can begin to understand that even in the study of languages ​​there has been an inversion: it was believed that Sardinian resembles Spanish and Portuguese because we have been “dominated” by them in recent history, while probably the Spanish and Portuguese languages, in reverse, were imposed by the prehistoric Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean dominion of which, until now, we were not aware. New Sardinia has dedicated an article about it entitled: «That thread that binds Sardinians to Basques» by Paolo Curreli  in which an exceptional and ingenious linguist became aware of this Sardinian Corsican Atlantean linguistic heritage, and made it known to the world with his extraordinary works (from the article: “Hundreds of similar words in the study of Elexpuru Arregi. Many linguistic affinities . Two towns with the same names: Aritzo and Aritzu. But also Uri and Aristanus. The holly in Sardinian, galostiu, in Basque is gorostoi”). But Atlantidologists cannot arrive at these texts if no one shows their correlation with the theme of Atlantis. There is therefore still a lot of work to do, and this is just the beginning of a new era of studies. The peoples of the Corsican Sardinian block therefore influenced in prehistoric times the evolution of the current languages ​​and dialects and minority languages ​​of part of the Mediterranean and perhaps also of other places. Here is now explained in a very simple and crystalline way why the Sardinian, the Corsican, the Sicilian, the Basque, the Spanish, the Portuguese, the Veronese dialect (see for example all the names of asparagus, vegetables, etc. which are identical to those Sardinians) and who knows which others are so similar. Now that we have this information, we can resume the overtime work of theProfessor Bartolomeo Porcheddu   and confront your statements, which are now all perfectly correct and all not only explainable, but even understandable and obvious to reason. What Professor Bartolomeo Porcheddu says is right and correct (in my eyes it is obvious, there is not even need to underline it, but in the interviews we sometimes get the impression that your theses are considered “fringe theories”, as if they were pseudo -science, while instead they are a demonstration of genius and intuition out of the ordinary). There are various sites that show how by now various scholars were already realizing the linguistic similarities between languages ​​and dialects of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block and other languages ​​and dialects scattered around the Mediterranean in particular, see also this article. Yet another article that talks about it is this one. In short, by now serious scholars were realizing that there was information we were not aware of, as if there really was an ancient civilization that was missing from the appeal of Ancient History, as Graham Hancock states: this civilization is the one that lived in the Corsican geological block currently semi-submerged, when this was an island and dry land: Graham Hancock was therefore right on this point. The impact of this extraordinary discovery creates a sort of shock in the scholar’s mind: in fact, now there is a sense of dephasing, of distrust. How is it possible that hardly anyone had ever noticed, if we exclude some brilliant scholars who have even been laughed at for their claims? How is it possible that Plato was not believed? Even Aristotle himself did not believe him: “He who dreamed of Atlantis also made it disappear”. In conclusion: the old Egyptian priest was telling Solon, around 590 BC, that the Greeks are a young people, as the men of letters cyclically died from the catastrophes that periodically occur on the planet, and therefore their opinions on the past were like fairy tales, because they had not fixed historical events in written language. The Egyptians, on the other hand, fixed information on stone, so they had memories of facts that had faded over time. And he doesn’t immediately tell him about Atlantis, he tells him about the first Athens, founded in about 9600 BC, that is 1000 years before the city of Sais in Egypt. At that time, the Greeks accomplished a most extraordinary feat of all: they managed to free all the peoples of the Mediterranean from the invasion of one people,

There are other discoveries to support the Sardinian Corsican Atlantis thesis, but searching for the material takes time and sacrifice. I will do my best to provide as much evidence as possible to all of you readers, archaeologists, journalists and scientists. It is important that all possible evidence is presented in order to be able to show you that these are not mere coincidences. A coincidence would be normal. Four as well. But when we bring 40+ coincidences to support, then maybe it’s not coincidences but potential evidence.
Prof. Sergio Frau (2002) realized that “ Sardinia is Atlantis“, while in reality it is a plateau of the Corsican Atlantean Sardinian geological block, and has therefore tried to make the Island of Atlas collimate with Sardinia. The problem is that Sardinia is only a subset of Atlantis, therefore the whole Sardo-Corsican continental shelf was missing, which is currently submerged as the Platonic story of Timaeus and Critias says, and the mountainous area north of the island of Atlantis was missing, the emerged part of which is now called “Corsica”. Furthermore, Corsica was ceded to France, terribly complicating the search even more: in fact, human beings mentally, seeing that one part is Italian and one French, instinctively think that they are two different realities, while instead they are the same submerged island , as world-renowned geologists have already confirmed to me that they know. But geologists call this submerged island millennia ago with the name of “Sardinian Corsican geological block”, while the Egyptian priest who told Solon could not use the terms “Sardinia” and “Corsica” which did not yet exist. Then the archaeologists, using the scientific method, verified Frau’s claims, and they realized that scientifically the accounts did not add up, and they are right. In reality, both Frau and the archaeologists were right: Frau was right, as Sardinia is a subset of the Corsican Atlantean Sardinian island. The archaeologists were right, as Sardinia is too small in size to be Atlantis. Furthermore, the nuragic dating was unfortunately not correct, so it was rightly observed by our scientists. Perhaps what leaves us perplexed is the fact that Atlantis is a submerged island, so: why were the submerged bathymetries never shown during hundreds of encounters? Why haven’t bathymetry experts been summoned? This will likely remain a mystery for years to come. Voglio col presente messaggio sottolineare la mia profonda stima per tutti gli studiosi, archeologi, geologi, ricercatori, giornalisti come Sergio Frau e Graham Hancock, che hanno contribuito alla ricerca mondiale della verità. Avete tutti la mia lode ed il mio rispetto. Grazie per il lavoro che avete fatto e che ancora fate. La ricerca scientifica mondiale può progredire soltanto se ogni singolo cittadino può dare il suo contributo, anche quando dice stupidaggini: perché tanto un errore nella ricerca non uccide nessuno, basta che la ricerca poi prosegua. E l’importante è che la smettiamo di sbranarci tra scienziati e ricercatori: il nostro scopo può essere la serena ricerca della verità, con sereno dialogo. Non è grave se un cittadino traduce male il testo originale greco. “Non dobbiamo picchiarlo, per questo”: cerchiamo di porre al centro il dialogo, la discussione, e smettiamola di farci la guerra tra fazioni di pensiero. “Non sono d’accordo con quello che dici ma darei la vita affinché tu possa dirlo” (frase non di Voltaire, ma di Evelyn Beatrice Hall). Attendo la risposta dei ricercatori alle mie affermazioni sull’Atlantide Sardo Corsa attualmente semisommersa.

Se volete capire davvero Atlantide: studiare la geologia del blocco sardo corso sommerso. Studiare gli elefanti nani sardi ritrovati in Sardegna, chiamati Mammuthus Lamarmorae. Quando Platone scrive che “era presente la specie degli elefanti” sta parlando di questo animale, non degli elefanti indiani. Per capire atlantide è necessario conoscere la toponomastica del Sulcis: “Poseidone vi mise due sorgenti, una d’acqua fredda ed una d’acqua calda”. I sardo corso atlantidei infatti hanno chiamato i paesi del Sulcis coi seguenti nomi: Acquafredda (scomparso in età medioevale, ma è rimasto a Siliqua un Castello d’Acquafredda), Acquacadda, S’acqua callenti de Susu, S’acqua callenti de Baxiu, Piscinas (forse a seguito della sommersione del blocco geologico sardocorso), la fonte di Zinnigas esiste ancora, Is Sais Superiore ed Is Sais inferiore (che probabilmente hanno dato il nome alla città di Sais in Egitto dove hanno raccontato di Atlantide a Solone). Il DNA Atlantideo è stato già trovato e studiato dal Professor Carlo Lugliè, che ha già stabilito SCIENTIFICAMENTE che questa popolazione ha un dna diverso da quello dei neolitici che hanno popolato la sardegna 3000 tremila anni più tardi. Certo! Se c’è stata una catastrofe con l’affondamento del blocco geologico sardo corso, è ovvio che siano morti e in seguito sia venuta una popolazione con dna diverso. Nel Sulcis Poseidone amava le grotte, evidentemente. Vi erano le grotte di IS Zuddas e Acquacadda (ecco che torna il tema dell’acqua calda e fredda e quindi delle fonti). Ma quando si spostava a nord, probabilmente, andava nelle grotte di Alghero, che ancora i Romani conoscevano come Grotte di Nettuno. Ma Nettuno è il nome latino di Poseidone! Quindi le grotte di Nettuno sono la località di trasferta di questo antico sovrano quando andava al nord, probabilmente dai figli in visita. Fino ad oggi, si pensava che Poseidone/Nettuno fosse un mito/leggenda, invece era un sovrano antichissimo, poi deificato. Questo fatto si chiama “EVEMERISMO”. Suggerisco a tutti i lettori che diate un’occhiata, per imparare nuove cose. Se ciò che affermo è vero, posso dimostrarlo in qualche modo? Se una persona è intelligente lo può dedurre nel seguente modo. I Mammuthus Lamarmorae sono stati per ora trovati almeno in 3 località: Funtanammari a Gonnesa, ad Alghero dove c’è la grotta di Nettuno, e se non erro nel Sinis. Ad Alghero abbiamo appena detto che ci sono le Grotte di Nettuno, quindi Poseidone ci andava, e vi hanno trovato il mammuth sardo nano. Se analizzate la toponomastica di Gonnesa, hanno trovato un altro Mammuth nano della specie degli elefanti a Funtanamari, che significa “Fontana al mare”. Ma la fontana è una fonte d’acqua! Ecco il tema dell’Isola ricca di fonti d’acqua. Ora, il sacerdote egizio ha detto a Solone, intorno al 590 a.C., un sacco di cose, ma gli archeologi non possono arrivare a pretendere che il sacerdote gli insegnasse anche la lingua ed i vari dialetti sardocorsoatlantidei. Tutte quelle che elenco non sono coincidenze: Atlantide è davvero il blocco sardo corso attualmente semisommerso. Probabilmente gli studiosi, ora, fingendo di credere alle cose che io dico, cominceranno ad accorgersi a poco a poco che ho ragione e che non sto mentendo.
Se Atlantide è davvero il blocco semisommerso sardocorso, allora bisognerà riscrivere daccapo alcune parti della preistoria e della Storia. Questo lavoro lo lascio a Voi. Io non ne sono capace. Per me è già stato uno sforzo sovraumano riuscire a rimettere ordine in mezzo a tutto questo casino. Non mi interessa la fama. Il Professor Ugas a mio avviso ci è andato vicino parlando della costa atlantica dell’Africa, ma secondo me per capirlo meglio potrebbe riapprofondire il testo di Marco Ciardi, quando parla di Bailly (Ciardi M., Atlantide Una controversia scientifica da Colombo a Darwin, Carocci editore, Roma, 1° edizione, novembre 2002, p.92-97): in pratica una parte della colonia atlantidea colonizzò l’area indicata dal Prof. Ugas, mentre Poseidone divenne il sovrano dell’isola sardocorsa ora sommersa. Attenzione! E’ importante notare che la piattaforma continentale sardo corsa attualmente sommersa, è di dimensioni immense! Quella era parte integrante dell’isola. 11.000 anni di erosione delle correnti marine hanno generato il fango che circondava l’isola nel racconto platonico, e tale fango, depositandosi, ha pulito le acque dell’attuale Sardegna rendendole cristalline. Inoltre, esiste un piccolissimo deserto nel Sulcis. Questo deserto, con grandissima probabilità, è artificiale. Serviranno ulteriori studi per dimostrarlo, ora non sono in grado di fornirVi altre prove.
Spero che questi miei post siano interessanti. Se non lo sono, cancello tutto e lascio perdere. Spero che tra centinaia di persone, ve ne siano almeno una o due che capiscano l’importanza di ciò che sto facendo.
Chiedo scusa se ho momenti di rabbia: sono furioso per il fatto che il mondo scientifico continua ad insistere a raccontare balle agli uditori. Non è giusto che proprio gli scienziati e studiosi diffondano balle. E’ ingiusto. E’ ingiusto che non si sia chiamato un esperto di batimetrie della Sardegna/Corsica. E’ ingiusto che non si sia chiamato il Prof. Carlo Lugliè per interrogarlo sulla veridicità di quanto da me affermato. E’ ingiusto che nessuno abbia NEMMENO NOMINATO il Mammuthus Lamarmorae della specie degli elefanti. Se non l’avete mai visto andate al museo di Iglesias. Ma la prossima volta, per favore, parlatene.
Per me è un dovere morale rendere pubbliche queste informazioni.
Sono almeno 2600 anni che nessuno ha capito che il Timeo non è solo un testo di Astronomia, ma anche di Geologia, visto che tratta l’affondamento geologico del blocco sardocorsoatlantideo.

Per gli archeologi: sta avvenendo un cambio di paradigma, come spiegato nel libro di Thomas Kuhn, La struttura delle rivoluzioni scientifiche, come mutano le idee della scienza, Einaudi, Torino, 1969: l’ho chiamato “Il paradigma sardo corso atlantideo”. Prima tutti credevano che le orbite fossero circolari, seguendo Aristotele come Voi seguite Lilliu (in stile “Ipse Dixit”, “Lilliu dixit”). Poi si accorsero, dopo una infinità di prove su prove, che le orbite sono ellitiche. Poi avvenne un altro cambio di paradigma: la Bibbia diceva che la terra era al centro dell’Universo, e Copernico disse che nel fuoco dell’orbita ellittica era il Sole. Galileo confermò, e gli mostrarono gli strumenti della tortura, che spero Voi non mi mostriate. Bruno però fu arso vivo, poveretto. Ora Vi chiedo: concedetemi il beneficio del dubbio e fate delle controverifiche sulle mie asserzioni, per cortesia. Forse ci metterete molto, ma capirete che siamo nuovamente di fronte a qualcosa di straordinario: un nuovo cambio di paradigma. L’isola di Atlantide è il nome egizio per il blocco geologico sardo-corso attualmente semisommerso, i cui due altopiani che emergono fuori dall’acqua oggi sono noti coi nomi di Sardegna e Corsica. Il Prof. Carlo Lugliè può aiutarVi, spiegandoVi che la popolazione atlantidea originaria, intorno a 11.000 anni fa, aveva un dna differente dai neolitici che popolarono 3000 anni dopo la catastrofe, e viveva soprattutto procacciandosi risorse marine, e per questo motivo, gli insediamenti atlantidei erano dislocati prevalentemente sulle coste. E’ per questo motivo che la civiltà è stata quasi in toto spazzata via: perché abitavano le coste e queste sono state sommerse “nel breve volgere di un giorno e una notte di terribili terremoti e diluvi”. Oggi la scienza chiama le paleocoste atlantidee col nome di “piattaforma continentale sardo-corsa”. Inoltre, ci sono stati ben 11.000 anni di correnti marine che hanno eroso e distrutto le strutture costiere. Forse è impossibile ritrovare ancora dei resti di questa civiltà. Inoltre, Il Governo Andreotti ha concesso agli Stati Uniti di mettere una base di sommergibili nucleari a La Maddalena, per cui gli Americani hanno avuto almeno mezzo secolo per fare le loro scorribande coi sottomarini nelle nostre acque, prima che le Soprintendenze si svegliassero e capissero cosa stesse succedendo. E siccome gli Americani sono furbi, hanno messo una “base militare” proprio a Teulada, nel Sulcis. Ma guarda, che coincidenza… Fantarcheologia? Care soprintendenze, dove si trovano i Vostri sottomarini per l’esplorazione costiera? Dove sono le Vostre migliaia di relazioni sui fondali marini sardocorsi? Dove sono le batimetrie 3D dei fondali? O forse non le ha fatte nessuno? E dove sono le lettere ai Ministri, per chiedere di ottenere queste cose? Per ottenere i finanziamenti spiegandone l’importanza immensa per la Storia della Civiltà Umana? Se Atlantide sardo corsa è affondata intorno al 9600 a.C., perché state sprecando fiato ed energia a cercare Atlantide negli strati nuragici? Una volta che si prenda per buona l’esistenza di Atlantide con capitale Sulcis, si ha idea precisa di dove cercare le strutture descritte da Platone. https://www.atlantisfound.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Capitale-di-Atlantide-Luigi-Usai-17-febbraio-2023-pulita.png Prof. Ugas can confirm that the dimensions coincide perfectly with what Plato said, also the distance of the capital from the sea, about 8.8 kilometers. Perhaps the problem is that the structures could also be 100 meters underground, because at first glance it seems that they have been submerged by mountains of earth (this needs to be verified, but it is understandable to the eye). Salvatore Dedola is a genius: he noticed the incredible overlap between Sardinian and Babylonian, Sumerian and Akkadian names. “There was a Paleo-Neolithic linguistic coenosis”. It is all right! The linguistic coenosis was caused by the Atlantean people of the Sardinian coast, i.e. the same inhabitants whose DNA has already been analyzed in two individuals out of three of the rock shelter of Su Carroppu. The Sardo-Corsican Atlanteans migrated to the Mediterranean. And these migrations would explain the Cretan civilization which worshiped the bull, which had the Labrys, it would explain the highly evolved culture and the engraving of Poseidon’s trident found on the Palace of Knossos; and it would explain why the Sardinian ingots are found in Crete, in Cyprus, and why there is Akrotiri in Cyprus and there is a second Akrotiri in Santorini, where an evolved civilization lived that even had toilets and pipes… It would explain why on Mount Carmel they then found structures from the Nuragic era. It would explain why Atlit-Yam, Pavlopetri, Herakleion/Thonis, Baia and who knows how many others that you haven’t even found yet… And it would also explain why Atlit-Yam had that name, since perhaps Atlantis was the mother island from which they had migrated…Since Atlantis had laws (the orichalcum column engraved with the laws, on the top of which they poured bull’s blood? Sound familiar?), is it not surprising that the descendants then created the Code of Hammurabi, strengthened by the legal knowledge developed in the previous millennia on the Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean geological block. Give me the benefit of the doubt for just a moment. The Romans sought the Damnatio Memoriae for Atlantis. They subdued them, perhaps stripped the Neptune Caves of the little material that perhaps still remained, but they continued to call them by their name. In short, they knew Poseidon/Neptune, for them he was still a historical figure. At this point it wouldn’t surprise me if names related to Atlantis had been banned, and maybe Atlas has become Antas, which could clarify the toponym S’Antadi. I haven’t been able to research this and I’m absolutely not capable of it. and S’Antadi also appears in Sant’Antonio di Santadi (but look what an incredible coincidence? The Americans have set up a military base here too… but what a strange coincidence… and then in Perdas de Fogu there is another military base, just where they stole the DNA of the inhabitants… what a strange coincidence… but of course I’m imaginative, huh? How about?) At the military base of the La Maddalena submarines, the Americans brought, hear hear… moles to create tunnels among the largest in the world then existing. Why? Why were the Americans interested in digging huge tunnels in and around La Maddalena? What were they looking for underground? Had they seen any kind of metal via satellite (can be done)? I understand if they carry a missile, if they carry other materials useful for military purposes, but what about moles to dig tunnels? Perhaps it may be interesting to analyze where military bases are located to extract other useful information. Nuclear submarines for the Mediterranean? Just halfway between Sardinia and Corsica? There were incidents, and the newspapers once reported that the submarine was right in Teulada.

Atlantis exists, found by Dr. Luigi Usai

To learn more:

  • the Atlantean name Gadiro, translated into Greek as Eumelo (reminiscent of Emilio);
  • the relations between Karnak and Carnac;
  • the Gadirica area and the exact location of the Columns: El Haouaria bank?
  • are all the Gadiros therefore Sardinian-Corsican-Atlanteans?: starting from this hypothesis, find all the Gadiros mentioned in the official ancient history (one was Cretan; one was a poet; one won the Olympic Games competing with the foals brought to the funeral of Patroclus; find others);
  • The presence of Sardinian toponyms that include the Sardinian divinities Corso Atlantis Isis and Horo (Oro): see the toponyms with Isidoro –> there is the possibility that the adoration of Isidoro was later Christianized in Sant’Isidoro. Note the presence of the same toponymy in Tenerife, a Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean colony.
  • Further study to be done, on “mitza” Sardinian meaning -> means source, pool of water, as in the Platonic myth. It has a similar meaning in the Hebrew language, which is Semitic like Sardinian. I have the impression that the Jewish people in search of the promised land were nothing more than a portion of Sardinian peoples who migrated to Egypt in search of a land that would not sink, unlike the Sardinian block that was sinking. And this sinking, known only in remote times, every x thousand years, with the partial sinkings, is the same one that quoted Montezuma, stating that his ancestors came from the Atlantic Ocean (that is, the Mediterranean before 9600 BC), leaving a perfect land that was sinking though.
  • The Cretans were Sardinian-Corsican Atlantean migrations –> Another reflection for archaeologists: why have I never heard any scholar make comparisons between the Minotaur and Su Boe Erchitu and Su Boe Muliache ? Why has no one ever pointed out that the minotaur is a Sardinian-Corsican mythological figure ? Look for the images of these characters online and you will understand that the minotaur is probably nothing more than an ancient Sardinian belief / legend, revived in Crete . The Minoans were Sardinian-Corsican-Atlantean migrations to Crete; as you know, Evans chose the word “Minoans” arbitrarily. There is also the androcephalic or bronze bull of Nule , which does nothing but confirm all these statements. Su Boe Erchitu is a legendary creature of Sardinian popular tradition . This is not to be confused with Su Boe Muliache, another Sardinian legendary creature .I’m not saying I’m really right. I’m saying: why don’t we try to explore other avenues of thought? Why don’t we look for other kinds of solutions to unsolved problems? I hope these sentences of mine are understood for what they are: it is obvious that I am not a specialist; my proposal to scholars is to be open to examining possibilities that until now had been excluded a priori. Again, I invite you to re-examine the toponymy of Sulcis, because all those names of towns that refer to the Platonic myth are too strange: in Carbonia there is a hamlet called “Acqua Callentis”; in Nuxis “S’acqua callenti de Basciu”, S’Acqua callenti de Susu; the medieval town of Acquafredda disappeared, which left the castle of Acquafredda; the source of Zinnigas; and there are even links to Egyptian toponymy: Heliopolis (city of the sun) and in Sulcis Terr’e Soli (land of the sun, Terresoli). Sais in Egypt and Is Sais Inferiore and Is Sais Superiore in Sulcis. In short, in my opinion this toponymy should be seriously taken into consideration by a self-respecting scholar. I can also understand that perhaps no one had noticed until now, but now that I have made the information public, in my opinion it may be worthwhile for some scholars to start treading these new unexplored paths.
  • The last few days I realized that Cabras is a surname, it is the name of a town; it is the locality where they found the Giants of Mont’e Prama; and I thought: “Cabras in Sardinian means goats”; this name can even date back to the Paleolithic! Immediately afterwards I thought: “I wonder if there was an ancient village called Brebeis”, which means “sheep” in Sardinian. I thought these things about 2 days ago. Just now, examining the Sulcis, I realized that there is the Is Brebeis pond, Stagno Le Pecore, right in the Sulcis . Crazy: it seems that my theories have a match in the real world, everything now seems to have a deep and even intuitive meaning. I had never heard of this Is Brebeis pond before…


If the Sardinian Corsican Atlantis theory were true and scientifically proven , there would be many immediate consequences from a scientific, historical, anthropological, cultural, linguistic, commercial and philosophical point of view. Here are some examples:

  1. Scientific : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could stimulate new scientific research to better understand this civilization and its impact on the ancient world. New excavation and study campaigns may be required to explore the submerged ruins and ancient artifacts.
  2. Historical : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could change the way we view ancient history. More research may be needed to better understand how this civilization developed and how it interacted with other Mediterranean cultures.
  3. Anthropological : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could provide new information on the cultural exchanges between the different civilizations of the ancient Mediterranean. More research may be needed to better understand how these cultures interacted with each other and how they influenced each other’s traditions and customs.
  4. Cultural : The legend of Atlantis has fascinated people for centuries and the discovery of its true location could inspire new works of art and literature. New stories, poems, paintings and sculptures representing this lost civilization could be created.
  5. Linguistic : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could provide new information on the diffusion of languages ​​in the ancient Mediterranean. More research may be needed to better understand how these languages ​​spread among different Mediterranean cultures.
  6. Trade : The discovery of such an advanced civilization on such a remote island could suggest the existence of unknown trade routes between the different cultures of the Mediterranean. More research may be needed to better understand how these routes worked and how they influenced the diffusion of ideas and innovations.
  7. Philosophical : The legend of Atlantis has been passed down from the ancient Greeks and the discovery of its true location could provide new perspectives on ancient Greek philosophy. More research may be needed to better understand how the ancient Greeks incorporated the legend of Atlantis into their philosophical musings.

In general, if the Sardinian Corsican Atlantis theory were true and scientifically proven, it would have many immediate consequences from a scientific, historical, anthropological, cultural, linguistic, commercial and philosophical point of view.

Colonie Sardo Corso Atlantidee before the submersion of the Sardinian-Corsican geological block

Among the best known Sardinian Corsican Atlantean colonies before the submersion of the Sardinian Corsican Atlantean geological block, there are the structures found in Turkey of Gobekli Tepe, Karan Tepe and other similar ones still being analyzed today. Reconstructing this information is extremely difficult, but we could try to do it, starting for example from the symbols. The structure with concentric circles should by now be known as a reference to the structure of Sulcis, where the ancient Sardinian-Corsican ruler Poseidon set up residence together with Clito, on a hill/hill near Santadi and Sant’Anna Arresi. Gobekli Tepe and Karan Tepe present Atlantean structures called Taulas (tables), in the shape of a T, which the Atlanteans had also built on the island of Menorca. The Sardinian Corsican Atlantean Mesolithic symbolism is present in Turkey in the various Tepes excavated so far, as they include the Bull sacred to the Atlanteans, and the vulture. The Atlantean vulture, represented in Turkey, will then be represented among the people of Egypt with the sacred representation of Mut and Nekhbet. In particular, the Egyptians, to clarify that they were speaking of the Sardinian-Corsican Atlanteans, placed the symbol of the Metallurgy of Sulcis in the claws of Nekhbet, which we show in the image immediately below:

Nekhbet with the symbol of the sacred Metallurgy of Sulcis
Nekhbet with the symbol of the sacred Metallurgy of Sulcis
Nekhbet with the symbol of the sacred Metallurgy of Sulcis
Nekhbet with the symbol of the sacred Metallurgy of Sulcis
Nekhbet with the symbol of the sacred Metallurgy of Sulcis
Nekhbet with the symbol of the sacred Metallurgy of Sulcis
Nekhbet with the symbol of the sacred Metallurgy of Sulcis
Nekhbet with the symbol of the sacred Metallurgy of Sulcis
Nekhbet with the symbol of the sacred Metallurgy of Sulcis
Nekhbet with the symbol of the sacred Metallurgy of Sulcis

The Sardinian Corsican Atlanteans built the Gobekli Tepe and Karan Tepe structures as a demonstration of their technological advancement and architectural skills, and this had great cultural significance for them. Their behavior could not go unnoticed, and showed other populations new ways of living, new behaviors, new religions. There was an ongoing cultural exchange between different civilizations and populations. This also explains why the Taulas of Menorca are also present in Gobekli Tepe. To clarify all these oddities, a paradigm shift was needed, which we will call the Sardinian Corso Atlantide Paradigm, which manages to clarify many hitherto obscure aspects of the archaeological and anthropological past.





I would like to point out that I have done everything to make this data public and disclose it, but I have hit a brick wallboth from the Superintendencies, who never replied to my emails or my pecs, and from the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, which never replied to my emails or my pecs, and from various university professors and archaeologists whom I contacted privately. I was told that “The scientific community proper does not exist”, or that “they do not disclose the discoveries of other scholars”. In practice, if an ordinary citizen makes a potential discovery, he is not provided with any support to communicate it to the scientific world. There is the expectation that an inexperienced person, who has never done it before, creates a perfect scientific paper from scratch, with all the trappings, and delivers it to I don’t know who for publication and analysis by the scientific community. In my opinion this is a shameful thing. I would have expected help in first trying to arrange my claims in an understandable way, and then in disseminating for analysis and cross-checking the veracity of the claims. Same attitude from the publishing houses: they would have published the book, but only after the scientists had confirmed my statements.

The Superintendencies and at least one Ministry of the Italian Government have never replied to my pecs (certified e-mail with equivalent value to Registered Mail with Return Receipt) where I reported the discovery within 24 hours as per current legislation on the procurement of Archaeological or Cultural Heritage. Maybe they thought it was a joke .


1) I distrust them publicly ;

2) based on current legislation, I have a legal and moral duty to protect and safeguard the findings made : I made the news public to prevent the discovery and the findings from being ruined in recent years (damaged, sabotaged, stolen, illegally exported, destroyed by incompetent people such as inexperienced construction personnel carrying out field maneuvers etc.) due to State mismanagement of finds. In fact, by law I would have the obligation of silence, to be entitled to the economic percentage on the discovery. But in this case, my conscience requires me to make the news public because in my opinion it isState officials who are supposed to protect the discovery and the findings (cultural assets, treasures, works of art, artifacts, ports, villages, boats, etc.), are currently endangering it with their apparent indifference.


Some Data/Information used in this website was made available by the EMODnet Human Activities project and Emodnet, www.emodnet-humanactivities.eu, funded by the European Commission Directorate General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.

On the basis of current legislation, considering the animus derelinquendi towards the corpus derelictionis, I declare the find and/or the objects present therein Res Nullius and Res Derelicta, except for different regulatory provisions which will be evaluated from time to time with the competent Authorities.